Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran GAS-FisMat Berbasis Computational Thinking pada Topik Diferensial Parsial
Kata Kunci:
Computational Thinking, Diferensial Parsial, GAS-FisMat, Media Pembelajaran, Model 3D+IAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan serta menguji kelayakan dan kepraktisan media pembelajaran GAS-FisMat (Google Apps Script untuk Fisika Matematika) pada topik diferensial parsial. Media yang dikembangkan mengintegrasikan simulasi interaktif dan lembar kerja mahasiswa dengan perancah computational thinking untuk membantu mahasiswa memahami konsep matematika fisika yang abstrak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Research and Development (R&D) dengan menerapkan model pengembangan 3D+I (Define, Design, Develop, Implementation). Validitas kelayakan media dinilai oleh lima orang ahli yang mencakup tiga kriteria utama, yaitu validasi konten, kualitas media, dan kegunaan pedagogis. Hasil validasi menunjukkan skor rata-rata kelayakan sebesar 83,13%, yang mengindikasikan bahwa media ini valid dan layak digunakan. Tahap implementasi dilakukan terhadap 26 mahasiswa calon guru fisika dan 5 orang dosen pendidikan fisika untuk mengukur tingkat kepraktisan media melalui angket respons. Hasil uji kepraktisan menunjukkan persentase sebesar 87,6% berdasarkan respons mahasiswa dan 91,2% berdasarkan respons dosen, yang keduanya termasuk dalam kategori kepraktisan yang tinggi. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, media GAS-FisMat dinyatakan layak dan praktis untuk digunakan sebagai media pembelajaran interaktif pada mata kuliah matematika fisika, khususnya pada topik diferensial parsial.
Unduhan
Referensi
Bollen, L., Van Kampen, P., Baily, C., & De Cock, M. (2016). Qualitative investigation into students’ use of divergence and curl in electromagnetism. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 20134.
Boukarou, A., Zennir, K., & Georgiev, S. G. (2025). Partial differential equations in Sobolev and analytic spaces. World Scientific.
Branch, R. M., & Varank, İ. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer.
Bufasi, E., Hoxha, M., Cuka, K., & Vrtagic, S. (2022). Developing Student’s Comprehensive Knowledge of Physics Concepts by Using Computational Thinking Activities: Effects of a 6-Week Intervention. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i18.31743
Cano, M. J., Chacón-Vera, E., & Esquembre, F. (2015). Bringing partial differential equations to life for students. European Journal of Physics, 36(3), 35026.
Dorel, L. (2023). The relationship between visual and abstract comprehension in spatial geometry, and its importance to developing spatial perception and vision. International journal for technology in mathematics education, 30(4), 219–226.
Du, H., Liu, Z., & Zhu, P. (2026). Accurate Solution of High-Dimensional Partial Differential Equations: Research on Data-Physics Collaborative Modeling and Adaptive Sampling. Applied Soft Computing, 114472.
Evans, P., Vansteenkiste, M., Parker, P., Kingsford-Smith, A., & Zhou, S. (2024). Cognitive load theory and its relationships with motivation: A self-determination theory perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 7.
Fuhrmann, T. A., & Kautz, C. (2022). Understanding of differential equations in a highly heterogeneous student group. Towards a new future in engineering education, new scenarios that european alliances of tech universities open up, 288–297.
Gupta, N. (2007). Impact of experimental modules on the student learning in a mechanics course. 22nd Technical Conference of the American Society for Composites 2007-Composites: Enabling a New Era in Civil Aviation, 302–313.
Hahn, L., & Klein, P. (2023). The impact of multiple representations on students’ understanding of vector field concepts: Implementation of simulations and sketching activities into lecture-based recitations in undergraduate physics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1012787.
Handayani, R. D., Lesmono, A. D., Prastowo, S. B., Supriadi, B., & Dewi, N. M. (2022). Bringing Computational Thinking Skills Into Physics Classroom Through Project-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET56879.2022.9990631
Hofmann, J., Klein, P., Müller, A., & Neuhaus, J. (2026). Supporting sensemaking of physics equations: An intervention study in undergraduate courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 22(1), 10144.
Hyland, D., van Kampen, P., & Nolan, B. C. (2018). Outcomes of a service teaching module on ODEs for physics students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(5), 743–758.
Jeffery, A. B., & Bratton-Jeffery, M. F. (2005). Quality Function Deployment in Training Design. In Encyclopedia of Distance Learning (hal. 1543–1551). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Juprizal, J., Yusnidar, Y., Romundza, F., Syahri, W., & Miharti, I. (2026). Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Berbantuan Adobe Animate Berorientasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Materi Asam Basa. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 16(1), 189–197.
Karpov, A., Klepov, V., & Nikitin, A. (2018). On Mathematical Visualization in Education. International Conference on Convergent Cognitive Information Technologies, 11–27.
Kohnle, A., & Passante, G. (2017). Characterizing representational learning: A combined simulation and tutorial on perturbation theory. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 20131.
Kovács, Z. (2020). “Mathemachines” via LEGO, GeoGebra and CindyJS. International Workshop on Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing, 390–401.
Nandyansah, W., Suprapto, N., & Mubarok, H. (2020). Picsar (physics augmented reality) as a learning media to practice abstract thinking skills in atomic model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1), 12049.
Partarakis, N., & Zabulis, X. (2024). Applying Cognitive Load Theory to eLearning of Crafts. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8010002
Qerimi, L., Malone, S., Rexigel, E., Mehlhase, S., Kuhn, J., & Küchemann, S. (2025). Exploring the mechanisms of qubit representations and introducing a new category system for visual representations: results from expert ratings. EPJ Quantum Technology, 12(1), 45.
Rezvanifard, F., Radmehr, F., & Rogovchenko, Y. (2023). Advancing engineering students’ conceptual understanding through puzzle-based learning: A case study with exact differential equations. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 42(2), 126–149.
Rivière, T. (2022). Exploring the unknown: The work of Louis Nirenberg on partial differential equations. EMS Surveys in Mathematical Sciences, 9(1), 1–29.
Seifullina, B. S., & Shokybayev, Z. A. (2024). Educational implications of incorporating contemporary interactive techniques into the curriculum. Praxis Educativa, 19.
Swapna, Y., Nirmale, V., Pavani, N., Singh, C., Ranganathan, R., Thontla, A. R., & Kumar, N. M. (2024). Applications of partial differential equations in fluid physics. Commun. Appl. Nonlinear Anal, 31(1), 207–220.
Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Indiana Univ., Bloomington. Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped.
Tu, T., Li, C.-F., Zhou, Z.-Q., & Guo, G.-C. (2020). Students’ difficulties with partial differential equations in quantum mechanics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 20163.
Wilcox, B. R., & Pollock, S. J. (2015). Upper-division student difficulties with separation of variables. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 11(2), 20131.
Zang, Y., Bao, G., Ye, X., & Zhou, H. (2020). Weak adversarial networks for high-dimensional partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 411, 109409.
Zeynivandnezhad, F., Ismail, Z., & Yusof, Y. M. (2015). Teaching mathematical structures in differential equations using a computer algebra system to engineering students. 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 10–15.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (Sinafi)
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
